Tuesday, October 13, 2009

The Nobel Peace Prize – Really?

As the entire world knows by now, Barack Hussein Obama was awarded the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize. I’m told the nominations were made in February 2009 – the month following his inauguration as President of the United States.

In his first month in office he did nothing to save the world and create “peace in our day”. In his first nine months in office – to date – he has done nothing to further world peace.

So far, he’s continued the policies of George W Bush in Iraq and Afghanistan, even though his appointed top General now wants to change the strategy.

Barack Hussein Obama continues the Iran policies of George W Bush – orchestrating ever stricter sanctions while Iran continues its nuclear weapons development.

Terrorists still occupy Club Gitmo despite his executive order to close it. He still hasn’t figured out what to do with these worst of the worst terrorists captured on the field of battle.

He reneged on his earlier promise to continue George W Bush’s policy of extending the US ballistic missile shield to defend Poland and the Czech Republic.

Barack Hussein Obama nationalized large portions of the automobile and banking industries. He’s also working hard to nationalize the health insurance industry and cripple the energy industry while raising taxes on everyone in multiple ways in the middle of recession.

He raised tariffs on tires imported from China.

I can’t think of much else he’s done in his first nine months except talk and travel. He’s done a lot of that, visiting numerous cities overseas and taking every possible opportunity to apologize for everything done by the United States prior to the beginning of his term in office.

So, did the Nobel Committee award Barack Hussein Obama the Peace Prize for what he has done? No?

Perhaps he was awarded the prize for preventing John McCain from being President.

Why then? Because he’s black? If so, the award should’ve gone to the American voters who elected him.

Barack Hussein Obama in a short statement this morning said he is not worthy to receive this award. On the surface this seems one of the few times truth has escaped his lips.

On the other hand, the Nobel Peace Prize isn’t what it once was. It’s been so devalued in recent years that perhaps he is worthy. Worthy of a prize awarded for adherence to a radical socialist agenda – not for increasing peace in the world.

No comments:

Post a Comment